Program design and implementation (CAS HEiE) - week 2: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "DKS:Program design and implementation (CAS HEiE) === Week 2 - Elements of educational program design === * Interactive Class: Monday October 24: 17h00 - 19h15 * Interac...") |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Week 2 - Elements of educational program design == | |||
* Interactive Class: Monday October 24: 17h00 - 19h15 | * Interactive Class: Monday October 24: 17h00 - 19h15 | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
* Public tutoring session: Friday October 28: 17h-19h | * Public tutoring session: Friday October 28: 17h-19h | ||
== Needs analysis, competence framework and learning goal definition == | |||
* Presentation and discussion of a competency framework: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu/digcompedu-framework/digcompedu-proficiency-levels_en | * Presentation and discussion of a competency framework: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu/digcompedu-framework/digcompedu-proficiency-levels_en | ||
* Competence map (hands-on Moodle) | * Competence map (hands-on Moodle) | ||
== Program organisation == | |||
* Program structure (linked to the competence map) | * Program structure (linked to the competence map) | ||
* Program coordination and tutoring structure | * Program coordination and tutoring structure | ||
== Learner support and followup == | |||
* Global learner support (coaching, mentoring, advising, follow-up) | * Global learner support (coaching, mentoring, advising, follow-up) | ||
* Community building (-> Do profiles in Moodle, whatsapp, etc.) | * Community building (-> Do profiles in Moodle, whatsapp, etc.) | ||
== Evaluation == | |||
Evaluation is a design factor or at least influences design | Evaluation is a design factor or at least influences design | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
* Learning evaluation philosophy, policy and method | * Learning evaluation philosophy, policy and method | ||
== Certification == | |||
* accredited vs. micro-acreditations https://openbadges.org/ | * accredited vs. micro-acreditations https://openbadges.org/ | ||
== Assignments == | |||
==== Week 2 mini project ==== | ==== Week 2 mini project ==== | ||
| Line 42: | Line 44: | ||
* Comment on the competency framework of two or more other participants. Make sure that everyone gets at least one feedback. | * Comment on the competency framework of two or more other participants. Make sure that everyone gets at least one feedback. | ||
* Engage in discussion | * Engage in discussion | ||
Revision as of 16:31, 17 October 2022
DKS:Program design and implementation (CAS HEiE)
Week 2 - Elements of educational program design
- Interactive Class: Monday October 24: 17h00 - 19h15
- Interactive Class: Wednesday October 26: 17h00 - 19h15
- Public tutoring session: Friday October 28: 17h-19h
Needs analysis, competence framework and learning goal definition
- Presentation and discussion of a competency framework: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/digcompedu/digcompedu-framework/digcompedu-proficiency-levels_en
- Competence map (hands-on Moodle)
Program organisation
- Program structure (linked to the competence map)
- Program coordination and tutoring structure
Learner support and followup
- Global learner support (coaching, mentoring, advising, follow-up)
- Community building (-> Do profiles in Moodle, whatsapp, etc.)
Evaluation
Evaluation is a design factor or at least influences design
- Program and course evaluation (see also last module): Zaharias, P. (2004).
- Evaluation criteria, e.g. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000382843
- Learning evaluation philosophy, policy and method
Certification
- accredited vs. micro-acreditations https://openbadges.org/
Assignments
Week 2 mini project
- Define a simple competency framework
- Map competencies to a program, i.e., a list of some courses
- Define learner support framework
- Suggest certification / collaboration with other institutions if appropriate.
Week 12 exchange
- Comment on the competency framework of two or more other participants. Make sure that everyone gets at least one feedback.
- Engage in discussion